My intention with this episode is to set the tone for this year and explore how we can find balance, reclaim our power, and live with purpose amidst the chaos.
I really liked this podcast until we get to the part about PCR. I see you say "PCR Test" and then the other people commenting say "PCR Test," and I've been saying, for almost FIVE YEARS NOW, that the PCR is NOT A TEST.
I am not going to just let this pass, for my mental health, whatever! It's too important.
THE PCR (polymerase chain reaction) IS NOT A TEST. It's an amplifier. Why am I wound up about it? Because of how it is being used, because it continues a LIE, to "diagnose" the false "Covid" and then ***more vaccination*** for Covid! I am not accusing you of anything, but please, use the term correctly, or I may seize up and start chasing cats.
Dr. Mullis' is surely rolling over and over in his grave, his entry into which may have been enabled a bit early by Anthony Fauci... This whole thing is very, very stinky, and so I ask you, please, correct this surely inadvertent misspeak. Even as DNA itself is now under scrutiny for being a possible misstep itself, we can be sure, very very sure, that PCR is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC.
The PCR is NOT A TEST. IT DOES NOT "FIND" DISEASE. ONE CANNOT BE DIAGNOSED USING PCR.
Tom Cowan was one of the people I came across, VERY early in 2020... I have the first printing of his book "The Contagion Myth," (He later was forced to change the title a bit, in order for it to be ALLOWED to be sold...) in which he covers a LOT of clarifying things about a LOT of the misunderstood issues we are STILL seeing today, nearly five years later. I consider Cowan to be one of the True Blue medical guys, and I'm very thankful to have come across him waaaay back there, when we were still in Panic Mode (early 2020).
Here's a pre-Covid article written by a fellow scientist:
The experiment involves the use of chemical reactions. We have starting materials at the beginning, and products at the end. The effect would be the intensity of fluorescence (positive PCR test) after a series of chemical reactions. One question would be whether the PCR method is nonspecific. What can generate a positive result?
It is imperative to use different concentrations of the test material because virologists and their colleagues do dilutions. If there were no dilutions, they probably wouldn't get negative results, but almost all would be positive results. And so on. We'll see.
It could be a test for something not so specific at all, but it's certainly not a "polymerase chain reaction." It's not an "amplifier." We'll be helped by controls from Brett Hawes, Dr. David Speicher (master of virology; pcr expert) and Jamie Andrews.
Clearly, you know not your gluteus maximus from the joint between your radius and your ulna. Master of VIROLOGY???? That’s not even a thing, as you ought to know by now. I am telling you what the INVENTOR said, you silly person. Now go and do a LEEEEETLE bit of research and maybe, just maybe, thine eyes may be opened. 🙄 “Research Integrity,” my eye. You sound like a wee laddie. xo
I really liked this podcast until we get to the part about PCR. I see you say "PCR Test" and then the other people commenting say "PCR Test," and I've been saying, for almost FIVE YEARS NOW, that the PCR is NOT A TEST.
I am not going to just let this pass, for my mental health, whatever! It's too important.
THE PCR (polymerase chain reaction) IS NOT A TEST. It's an amplifier. Why am I wound up about it? Because of how it is being used, because it continues a LIE, to "diagnose" the false "Covid" and then ***more vaccination*** for Covid! I am not accusing you of anything, but please, use the term correctly, or I may seize up and start chasing cats.
Dr. Mullis' is surely rolling over and over in his grave, his entry into which may have been enabled a bit early by Anthony Fauci... This whole thing is very, very stinky, and so I ask you, please, correct this surely inadvertent misspeak. Even as DNA itself is now under scrutiny for being a possible misstep itself, we can be sure, very very sure, that PCR is NOT A DIAGNOSTIC.
The PCR is NOT A TEST. IT DOES NOT "FIND" DISEASE. ONE CANNOT BE DIAGNOSED USING PCR.
Tom Cowan was one of the people I came across, VERY early in 2020... I have the first printing of his book "The Contagion Myth," (He later was forced to change the title a bit, in order for it to be ALLOWED to be sold...) in which he covers a LOT of clarifying things about a LOT of the misunderstood issues we are STILL seeing today, nearly five years later. I consider Cowan to be one of the True Blue medical guys, and I'm very thankful to have come across him waaaay back there, when we were still in Panic Mode (early 2020).
Here's a pre-Covid article written by a fellow scientist:
https://dnascience.plos.org/2019/08/15/rip-kary-mullis-father-of-pcr/
(((Bodily Autominy))) &
((Precautionary Principle))
I agree about attacking thier "pcr" tool, but it has some of the same uphill battle as No-virus.
Keeping our rights to our body & some caution in mandates is very natural for even the sleepest of our brothers to understand & join.
Thanks Brett!!!
The experiment involves the use of chemical reactions. We have starting materials at the beginning, and products at the end. The effect would be the intensity of fluorescence (positive PCR test) after a series of chemical reactions. One question would be whether the PCR method is nonspecific. What can generate a positive result?
It is imperative to use different concentrations of the test material because virologists and their colleagues do dilutions. If there were no dilutions, they probably wouldn't get negative results, but almost all would be positive results. And so on. We'll see.
The PCR is not a test. See my comment. I'm telling you that since you appear to be a researcher.
It could be a test for something not so specific at all, but it's certainly not a "polymerase chain reaction." It's not an "amplifier." We'll be helped by controls from Brett Hawes, Dr. David Speicher (master of virology; pcr expert) and Jamie Andrews.
Clearly, you know not your gluteus maximus from the joint between your radius and your ulna. Master of VIROLOGY???? That’s not even a thing, as you ought to know by now. I am telling you what the INVENTOR said, you silly person. Now go and do a LEEEEETLE bit of research and maybe, just maybe, thine eyes may be opened. 🙄 “Research Integrity,” my eye. You sound like a wee laddie. xo