Revealing the illusion of legal and political remedy, the corporate structure of Canada, and the Spiritual Path to reclaiming your Freedom. With Dan Oke and Yayoi Takemoto.
Okay, so I finally got to actually listen to this!! Sorry, my email gets SO CRAMMED. I make sure I listen or read to your stuff, tho!
This podcast is RIGHT ON.
It's up to We the Peeps. And I DO think that wave we've been thinking of for five years... it's just beginning to crest. We are SO READY, those of us who have been watching this since waaaaaaay back there, 2020, like MARCH 2020 in my case... Well, we're just FED UP. And tired of it all. But it's gonna take longer than this. Getting into the weeds is where we're headed if we let them take us there. YES, it's WAR. But we can't go by the laws and the stuff we've been using -- WITHIN THE BROKEN, CORRUPT SYSTEM. Chess and checkers... We need to stop playing THEIR GAME. Cheers, this is good stuff.
Thank you for tuning in and for your comment. In some ways I think we’re going to have to look backwards towards the future. There are “old remedies” that have been in place to protect us and prevent us from getting us into the situation we find ourselves in today. It’s not going to be easy but I don’t see a way “out” through the current system (legal, political, etc). The challenge before us is: how do we not throw the baby out with the bath water? How can we use the good elements of the past to help us move forward? Anyway, lots to chew on here
I have two words that I want to just put “out there”—
Prudence, and Discernment.
I also think it behooves us to learn how to put Fear aside, to just get it out of our thoughts, because that seems to be the best way for Good Ideas to enter. How do we put fear aside? Trust. Trust in whatever we want to call that Higher Power, our Creator, the Divine, whatever, it doesn’t matter. What matters, in my view, anyway, is that we TRUST that which is known as that “Higher Power.” Allow it to open us up to IDEAS. Some of those ideas might be previously owned, lol. That’s okay, whatever works. ;) Cheers.
Indeed, you make the valid points, Brett. I agree, we’re NOT going to get out using the tools of the Bad Guys. So… time for some serious creativity, perhaps. And we know this: We’re a Very Creative Species. Let’s invite the Divine, however we want to think of it, or call it, into our plans… It’s those lightbulb moments we need! Onward! ^_^
To be fair, it's not a loop but rather an objective situation. The fact of the matter is that people have committed a crime and we are the victims of said crime. From a martial arts perspective it is not a situation of seeking a hero or becoming a hero but rather simply doing what is necessary as the situation arises, whatever that situation may be.
Elevating oneself out of a victim mentality does require acknowledging that there has been harm committed on to the individual. Raising your frequency and vibration above that victim status is part of the process to Healing, empowerment and taking steps towards ensuring that the same situation does not occur again. Again I'll speak practically, but in a simple martial art sense if somebody is throwing a punch at your head you are the victim of the attack. Of course this doesn't mean that you are forced to remain in the victim status, you can block and counter and keep yourself from harm if you so choose and if you have trained with the appropriate knowledge to respond to the attack. You could call that a villain victim hero Loop, or you could just simply acknowledge the simple reality that there was an attacker, and a victim of the attack but the victim defended themselves. In our current world situation children are dying due to a bio weapon and this premeditated attack was planned decades ago. Choosing to do something about that situation is not heroic, but is rather a lawful duty of care as well as a moral and spiritual responsibility. For those who wish to participate they are welcome to do so. For those who would like to observe from the sidelines they are also welcome to do so. According to universal law Free Will and choice must be held at the highest reverence and we cannot have our Free Will at the expense of somebody else's.
I know my position makes people super crunchy, which is why I share it. I needed to take 10,000 steps back from being fully immeresed in this work to begin to see more clearly.
Yes, harm has occurred. That’s not up for debate. But acknowledging harm is not the same as organizing your identity around it. The moment you adopt the posture of the harmed, whether as victim, defender, or hero, you’re consenting to the architecture that created the harm in the first place.
Blocking a punch isn’t about victimhood or valor. It’s simply a movement born from presence. No identity required. You don’t need to rise above or retaliate. You just don’t collapse.
This isn’t about being right. It’s about being resourced.
The real danger isn’t just the weapon, the policy, or the agenda. It’s the loop that says your value is proven through how you respond to harm. That loop feeds on polarity - oppressor and oppressed, awakened and asleep, righteous and complicit.
But coherence doesn’t emerge from charge. It comes from structure. From knowing where you stand, what you hold, and what you no longer participate in, even silently.
Free will doesn’t mean everyone gets to act however they want. It means no one has the right to force participation in a system that doesn’t reflect their truth. It means your “no” can be a complete correction, not a protest, not a plea, not a performance.
So yes, act. Respond. But let it be clean. Let it be clear. Let it be unentangled.
Very interesting framing and well-written. Definitely some things to think about. " It means no one has the right to force participation in a system that doesn’t reflect their truth" - we live in a world where there is no more shared reality. Everyone gets to define their own truth and reality as they see fit. This taps into the core of intersectional identity politics which unfortunately leaves us in no-mans land when it comes to Sovereignty. "It means your “no” can be a complete correction" - how does this work from a pragmatic perspective?
Great question, and it doesn't come with a one-size-fits-all answer. How does a “no” becomes a correction, especially when shared reality has eroded and everyone’s running their own version of the truth. That kind of fragmentation isn’t freedom, it’s instability.
Here’s the distinction I see - sovereignty isn’t proven through systems. It’s embodied. You don’t need paperwork to exit a false agreement if nothing in you is still consenting to it. No signal. No energy. No subtle performance. Just a clean internal discontinuation.
When you’re fully resourced in your own field, meaning you are clear on what you hold, where you stand, and what’s no longer yours, you don’t need anyone to recognize your position. You don’t need to argue it. You become unavailable.
That’s how a “no” lands. Not because you said it, but because there’s no part of you still participating in the thing you’ve exited.
Sovereignty doesn’t require paperwork. It requires presence.
I once heard that if the devil can’t get you to sell your soul, he’ll keep you busy. That’s what a lot of this began to feel like for me, which is why I had to pivot hard and fast.
I really appreciate your dedication to speaking on these topics and expanding awareness. I've circulated through many of the freedom/sovereign movements over the past 5 years and everything in my Being sees a massive blindspot re: how God and the Bible have been positioned in these processes because it still externalizes what must be internalized first and foremost. I don't claim to have an answer, and I'm not saying this information is not highly useful, but I can't seem to reconcile the villian-victim-hero-loop that remains within every process I've encountered.
Thanks for sharing Nicole, lots to chew on here. "my Being sees a massive blindspot re: how God and the Bible have been positioned in these processes" - this brings up the topic of where our moral framework comes from. One could argue that we could leave God and the Bible out of it but my question would be "do we another set of shared morals and guides that we can all agree upon collectively?" (not the say that the Bible is the definitive guide, more to ask what is the replacement). "what must be internalized first and foremost"...."I can't seem to reconcile the villian-victim-hero-loop" - there is a lot to unpack here. Firstly, there are two main processes/paths we could look into. 1) there have been crimes committed. We can ignore them or acknowledge them, that's up to us. We could also seek accountability and remedy if we wish to or not. This is in some way optional if we wish to remain out of the "victim mindset". 2) The other path is that of neutrality. Here we can simply say "I am no longer participating in the crime". BUT, in order for us to claim this status, we must reclaim our Natural Man/Woman status. This simply asserts that we choose to take ownership over our legal fiction which we were signed into without our consent. Reclaiming our status and asserting neutrality are probably the most peaceful ways we could go about all of this. And yes, we will always find a villain and a hero in the story if that's what we are looking for. Unfortunately we have to use some of the tools (treaties and international laws) to reclaim our Sovereignty. Some might say "why use these laws and treaties at all?" but then we are back to square one on moral framework as mentioned above. We also can't simply assert lawlessness as this opens the door to everyone being able to do whatever they want without any consequences (ie. murder someone as an example). I too don't have all the answers but I am pursuing this path as it makes sense to me; and because all other avenues seem compromised.
Thanks for your comment. I agree, there’s a lot to unpack, and you’re naming real tensions that many are sitting with.
The core distinction I’d offer is this. Acknowledging harm is necessary. But embedding yourself in a role relative to that harm whether victim, witness, or restorer, keeps you within the same narrative architecture that created the harm to begin with. That’s the loop.
Neutrality, when structurally held, isn’t about opting out of responsibility. It’s about disengaging from contracts you never consented to, without needing to prove your innocence, or earn your exit. But to do that cleanly, you need lawful standing. Not just in paperwork, but in presence. If you don’t know where you stand, you’ll keep trying to explain why you’re standing there.
Status correction can be part of that. But it’s not about becoming sovereign on paper. It’s about recognizing where you've been misrepresented, and removing your energy from that misalignment, legally, spiritually, relationally.
As for treaties and international law, they’re tools, not truth. Useful in transition, but not the destination. If your sovereignty depends on external validation, it’s still conditional. Authority that has to be proven isn’t yet embodied.
Finally on the moral framework, this is where many feel the ground shifting. We’re not just debating beliefs. We’re reckoning with the collapse of inherited structure. The Bible served as a container for shared values, yes. But sovereignty asks something deeper; can you hold internal order without needing external control?
That’s not a question of belief. It’s a question of capacity, and it’s the real work I have found missing in all facets of this space.
Thank you for sharing. I briefly looked through it, and I'm not resonating. This is the very conversation I've been circling for years, and they are full of externalities deeply entrenched in the villain-victim-hero narrative. My experience is and continues to be, people are trying to perfect things on paper that can only occur within. If you closely inspect the language, it is incompatable with the proposed end goal.
Also, by your response I don't think that you actually looked at the interview that I shared in the reply. I actually agree with the statement that people are trying to perfect things on paper while missing the internal. What you would find if you actually looked through the material and listen to what we have done or are trying to convey is that why the paperwork aspect is an action that is necessary for those who want to make a conscious choice we are also saying that it is extremely far from the be all and end all. This is one of the reasons that we have taken so much time over the past few years pointing out all aspects of the issues while really focusing on the question " what do you want to do about it?". Ultimately is an extremely individualized Soul Decision that everyone must make. This decision always benefits from a higher frequency or vibration and connection with one's higher self and Prime creator/Source/God etc.
The simple purpose of this interview was to connect some dots and show people with ears to hear and eyes to see the reality of the situation such as it is.
We are at war….
Indeed.
Okay, so I finally got to actually listen to this!! Sorry, my email gets SO CRAMMED. I make sure I listen or read to your stuff, tho!
This podcast is RIGHT ON.
It's up to We the Peeps. And I DO think that wave we've been thinking of for five years... it's just beginning to crest. We are SO READY, those of us who have been watching this since waaaaaaay back there, 2020, like MARCH 2020 in my case... Well, we're just FED UP. And tired of it all. But it's gonna take longer than this. Getting into the weeds is where we're headed if we let them take us there. YES, it's WAR. But we can't go by the laws and the stuff we've been using -- WITHIN THE BROKEN, CORRUPT SYSTEM. Chess and checkers... We need to stop playing THEIR GAME. Cheers, this is good stuff.
Thank you for tuning in and for your comment. In some ways I think we’re going to have to look backwards towards the future. There are “old remedies” that have been in place to protect us and prevent us from getting us into the situation we find ourselves in today. It’s not going to be easy but I don’t see a way “out” through the current system (legal, political, etc). The challenge before us is: how do we not throw the baby out with the bath water? How can we use the good elements of the past to help us move forward? Anyway, lots to chew on here
I have two words that I want to just put “out there”—
Prudence, and Discernment.
I also think it behooves us to learn how to put Fear aside, to just get it out of our thoughts, because that seems to be the best way for Good Ideas to enter. How do we put fear aside? Trust. Trust in whatever we want to call that Higher Power, our Creator, the Divine, whatever, it doesn’t matter. What matters, in my view, anyway, is that we TRUST that which is known as that “Higher Power.” Allow it to open us up to IDEAS. Some of those ideas might be previously owned, lol. That’s okay, whatever works. ;) Cheers.
Love it. Amen 🙏
Indeed, you make the valid points, Brett. I agree, we’re NOT going to get out using the tools of the Bad Guys. So… time for some serious creativity, perhaps. And we know this: We’re a Very Creative Species. Let’s invite the Divine, however we want to think of it, or call it, into our plans… It’s those lightbulb moments we need! Onward! ^_^
I haven't even been able to get to all my emails yet, but MAY 8.
THIS IS THE DAY WE WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER!!
THE TRUTH IS OUT!! CELEBRATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xo xo xo xo xo ^_^
👌
To be fair, it's not a loop but rather an objective situation. The fact of the matter is that people have committed a crime and we are the victims of said crime. From a martial arts perspective it is not a situation of seeking a hero or becoming a hero but rather simply doing what is necessary as the situation arises, whatever that situation may be.
Elevating oneself out of a victim mentality does require acknowledging that there has been harm committed on to the individual. Raising your frequency and vibration above that victim status is part of the process to Healing, empowerment and taking steps towards ensuring that the same situation does not occur again. Again I'll speak practically, but in a simple martial art sense if somebody is throwing a punch at your head you are the victim of the attack. Of course this doesn't mean that you are forced to remain in the victim status, you can block and counter and keep yourself from harm if you so choose and if you have trained with the appropriate knowledge to respond to the attack. You could call that a villain victim hero Loop, or you could just simply acknowledge the simple reality that there was an attacker, and a victim of the attack but the victim defended themselves. In our current world situation children are dying due to a bio weapon and this premeditated attack was planned decades ago. Choosing to do something about that situation is not heroic, but is rather a lawful duty of care as well as a moral and spiritual responsibility. For those who wish to participate they are welcome to do so. For those who would like to observe from the sidelines they are also welcome to do so. According to universal law Free Will and choice must be held at the highest reverence and we cannot have our Free Will at the expense of somebody else's.
I know my position makes people super crunchy, which is why I share it. I needed to take 10,000 steps back from being fully immeresed in this work to begin to see more clearly.
Yes, harm has occurred. That’s not up for debate. But acknowledging harm is not the same as organizing your identity around it. The moment you adopt the posture of the harmed, whether as victim, defender, or hero, you’re consenting to the architecture that created the harm in the first place.
Blocking a punch isn’t about victimhood or valor. It’s simply a movement born from presence. No identity required. You don’t need to rise above or retaliate. You just don’t collapse.
This isn’t about being right. It’s about being resourced.
The real danger isn’t just the weapon, the policy, or the agenda. It’s the loop that says your value is proven through how you respond to harm. That loop feeds on polarity - oppressor and oppressed, awakened and asleep, righteous and complicit.
But coherence doesn’t emerge from charge. It comes from structure. From knowing where you stand, what you hold, and what you no longer participate in, even silently.
Free will doesn’t mean everyone gets to act however they want. It means no one has the right to force participation in a system that doesn’t reflect their truth. It means your “no” can be a complete correction, not a protest, not a plea, not a performance.
So yes, act. Respond. But let it be clean. Let it be clear. Let it be unentangled.
Very interesting framing and well-written. Definitely some things to think about. " It means no one has the right to force participation in a system that doesn’t reflect their truth" - we live in a world where there is no more shared reality. Everyone gets to define their own truth and reality as they see fit. This taps into the core of intersectional identity politics which unfortunately leaves us in no-mans land when it comes to Sovereignty. "It means your “no” can be a complete correction" - how does this work from a pragmatic perspective?
Great question, and it doesn't come with a one-size-fits-all answer. How does a “no” becomes a correction, especially when shared reality has eroded and everyone’s running their own version of the truth. That kind of fragmentation isn’t freedom, it’s instability.
Here’s the distinction I see - sovereignty isn’t proven through systems. It’s embodied. You don’t need paperwork to exit a false agreement if nothing in you is still consenting to it. No signal. No energy. No subtle performance. Just a clean internal discontinuation.
When you’re fully resourced in your own field, meaning you are clear on what you hold, where you stand, and what’s no longer yours, you don’t need anyone to recognize your position. You don’t need to argue it. You become unavailable.
That’s how a “no” lands. Not because you said it, but because there’s no part of you still participating in the thing you’ve exited.
Sovereignty doesn’t require paperwork. It requires presence.
I once heard that if the devil can’t get you to sell your soul, he’ll keep you busy. That’s what a lot of this began to feel like for me, which is why I had to pivot hard and fast.
I really appreciate your dedication to speaking on these topics and expanding awareness. I've circulated through many of the freedom/sovereign movements over the past 5 years and everything in my Being sees a massive blindspot re: how God and the Bible have been positioned in these processes because it still externalizes what must be internalized first and foremost. I don't claim to have an answer, and I'm not saying this information is not highly useful, but I can't seem to reconcile the villian-victim-hero-loop that remains within every process I've encountered.
Thanks for sharing Nicole, lots to chew on here. "my Being sees a massive blindspot re: how God and the Bible have been positioned in these processes" - this brings up the topic of where our moral framework comes from. One could argue that we could leave God and the Bible out of it but my question would be "do we another set of shared morals and guides that we can all agree upon collectively?" (not the say that the Bible is the definitive guide, more to ask what is the replacement). "what must be internalized first and foremost"...."I can't seem to reconcile the villian-victim-hero-loop" - there is a lot to unpack here. Firstly, there are two main processes/paths we could look into. 1) there have been crimes committed. We can ignore them or acknowledge them, that's up to us. We could also seek accountability and remedy if we wish to or not. This is in some way optional if we wish to remain out of the "victim mindset". 2) The other path is that of neutrality. Here we can simply say "I am no longer participating in the crime". BUT, in order for us to claim this status, we must reclaim our Natural Man/Woman status. This simply asserts that we choose to take ownership over our legal fiction which we were signed into without our consent. Reclaiming our status and asserting neutrality are probably the most peaceful ways we could go about all of this. And yes, we will always find a villain and a hero in the story if that's what we are looking for. Unfortunately we have to use some of the tools (treaties and international laws) to reclaim our Sovereignty. Some might say "why use these laws and treaties at all?" but then we are back to square one on moral framework as mentioned above. We also can't simply assert lawlessness as this opens the door to everyone being able to do whatever they want without any consequences (ie. murder someone as an example). I too don't have all the answers but I am pursuing this path as it makes sense to me; and because all other avenues seem compromised.
Thanks for your comment. I agree, there’s a lot to unpack, and you’re naming real tensions that many are sitting with.
The core distinction I’d offer is this. Acknowledging harm is necessary. But embedding yourself in a role relative to that harm whether victim, witness, or restorer, keeps you within the same narrative architecture that created the harm to begin with. That’s the loop.
Neutrality, when structurally held, isn’t about opting out of responsibility. It’s about disengaging from contracts you never consented to, without needing to prove your innocence, or earn your exit. But to do that cleanly, you need lawful standing. Not just in paperwork, but in presence. If you don’t know where you stand, you’ll keep trying to explain why you’re standing there.
Status correction can be part of that. But it’s not about becoming sovereign on paper. It’s about recognizing where you've been misrepresented, and removing your energy from that misalignment, legally, spiritually, relationally.
As for treaties and international law, they’re tools, not truth. Useful in transition, but not the destination. If your sovereignty depends on external validation, it’s still conditional. Authority that has to be proven isn’t yet embodied.
Finally on the moral framework, this is where many feel the ground shifting. We’re not just debating beliefs. We’re reckoning with the collapse of inherited structure. The Bible served as a container for shared values, yes. But sovereignty asks something deeper; can you hold internal order without needing external control?
That’s not a question of belief. It’s a question of capacity, and it’s the real work I have found missing in all facets of this space.
Nicole I feel like this interview and the information contained within will resonate with you 👍
https://rumble.com/v5al71x-send-it-sunday-interstellar-war-and-the-law-of-peace-manual-harnessing-cosm.html
Thank you for sharing. I briefly looked through it, and I'm not resonating. This is the very conversation I've been circling for years, and they are full of externalities deeply entrenched in the villain-victim-hero narrative. My experience is and continues to be, people are trying to perfect things on paper that can only occur within. If you closely inspect the language, it is incompatable with the proposed end goal.
Also, by your response I don't think that you actually looked at the interview that I shared in the reply. I actually agree with the statement that people are trying to perfect things on paper while missing the internal. What you would find if you actually looked through the material and listen to what we have done or are trying to convey is that why the paperwork aspect is an action that is necessary for those who want to make a conscious choice we are also saying that it is extremely far from the be all and end all. This is one of the reasons that we have taken so much time over the past few years pointing out all aspects of the issues while really focusing on the question " what do you want to do about it?". Ultimately is an extremely individualized Soul Decision that everyone must make. This decision always benefits from a higher frequency or vibration and connection with one's higher self and Prime creator/Source/God etc.
The simple purpose of this interview was to connect some dots and show people with ears to hear and eyes to see the reality of the situation such as it is.