It’s not such a shock when cases are examined whereby litigants or defendants are prohibited by the court to submit vital evidence as ‘inadmissable’ - it’s become the norm. Every bit of evidence has to be admitted or there’s no fair trial or rigorous due process. It can work when it suits them though on retrials or dismissals on ‘technical’ or ‘procedural’ grounds … either way, you’re ‘caught’!
It was all done under False Pretense and deceptions at best (9/11) so everything enacted as a result must also be stricken and removed because in fact it is all illegal from its inception
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4388/all-info
(Text not included yet, as far as I could see)
It’s not such a shock when cases are examined whereby litigants or defendants are prohibited by the court to submit vital evidence as ‘inadmissable’ - it’s become the norm. Every bit of evidence has to be admitted or there’s no fair trial or rigorous due process. It can work when it suits them though on retrials or dismissals on ‘technical’ or ‘procedural’ grounds … either way, you’re ‘caught’!
Just moved, and getting settled! Will watch the full interview soon. xo xo
It was all done under False Pretense and deceptions at best (9/11) so everything enacted as a result must also be stricken and removed because in fact it is all illegal from its inception
100%!